找回密码
 快速注册

扫描二维码登录本站

手机号码,快捷登录

投行业服务、产品的撮合及交易! “投行先锋客户端” - 投行求职
      “项目”撮合 - 投行招聘

投行先锋VIP会员的开通及说明。 无限下载,轻松学习,共建论坛. 购买VIP会员 - 下载数量和升级

“投行先锋论坛会员必知和报到帖” 帮助您学习网站的规则和使用方法。 删帖密码积分先锋币评分

查看: 2700|回复: 0

[其它] 一篇关于BVI公司股权证和股东名册的文章

[复制链接]
发表于 2013-9-9 17:57:37 | 显示全部楼层 |阅读模式
    陆续接触过几个涉及红筹架构的项目,在尽调过程中需要查阅BVI或者开曼的法律文件,其中包括大量的share certificate和member of register。以下文章发自境外一家律所,对大家的尽调工作或许有所帮助。


Meaning Of Member Under The BVI Company Law
Last Updated: 29 August 2013
Article by Jonathan Addo
Harneys
                                                            
In the recent case of Comodo Holdings Ltd v (1) Renaissance Ventures Ltd; and (2) Joseph Katz (executor for the estate of Eric D Emanuel Dec'd) Harneys successfully argued that the Applicant defendants' ((R) and (J)) application for a stay in favour of arbitration in New York must be refused because R. and J. were not members of the respondent claimant company (C.) for the purposes of the Articles and/or the BVI Business Companies Act 2004. Harneys argued that the corollary of their inability to demonstrate membership was an absence of locus standi to invoke an arbitration clause in the Articles of Association of C.

R. and J. sought to rely on the evidence of share certificates issued in 2000 and 2001 in their names that stated they were registered shareholders, to support the contention that they were existing members of C. However, they were neither able to demonstrate that they were on the Share Register nor that they had paid for the Share Certificates. Furthermore, Harneys correctly argued that to assert that title to Shares constituted membership of a company, either under the old International Business Companies Act 1984 or the BVI Business Companies Act 2004, was to fundamentally misapprehend the policy of BVI companies legislation that is premised on the English company law framework.

Bannister J. upheld Harneys' proposition that prima facie evidence of title is not the same as membership of a company; and that corporate membership can only be evidenced by entry on the Share Register. His Lordship's finding followed the recent English Supreme Court ruling in Enviroco Lt v Farstad Supply A/S [2011] 2 BCLC 165 relied on by Harneys. Bannister J. followed Lord Collins' clear judgment in Enviroco, where the Supreme Court found that ever since the Companies Clause Consolidation Act 1845, membership has been determined by entry in the register of members. Bannister J. went further and found that as in England & Wales, the BVI companies legislation proceeds on that basis; the legislation would otherwise be unworkable and business efficacy requires it.

per incuriam Harneys also successfully argued and the Court agreed that in any event, an arbitration was not an apt forum to decide the question of whether a party had locus to arbitrate as was erroneously argued by counsel for R and J. BVI Court.
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.






您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 快速注册

本版积分规则

在线客服

法律及免责声明|服务协议及隐私条款|手机版|投行先锋 ( 陕ICP备16011893号-1 )

GMT+8, 2024-12-1 10:43 , Processed in 0.409674 second(s), 27 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.5

© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.

快速回复 返回顶部 返回列表